The Bell experiment and the limitations of actors

DOI10.1007/S10701-022-00572-YzbMATH Open1505.81016arXiv2205.12071OpenAlexW4280589958MaRDI QIDQ2139455FDOQ2139455

Authors: Inge S. Helland 

Publication date: 17 May 2022

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The well known Bell experiment with two actors Alice and Bob is considered. First the simple deduction leading to the CHSH inequality under local realism is reviewed, and some arguments from the literature are recapitulated. Then I take up certain background themes before I enter a discussion of Alice's analysis of the situation. An important point is that her mind is limited by the fact that her Hilbert space in this context is two-dimensional. General statements about a mind's limitation during a decision process are derived from recent results on the reconstruction of quantum theory from conceptual variables. These results apply to any decision situation. Let all the data from the Bell experiment be handed over to a new actor Charlie, who performs a data analysis. But his mind is also limited: He has a four-dimensional Hilbert space in the context determined by the experiment. I show that this implies that neither Alice nor Charlie can have the argument leading to the CHSH inequality as a background for making decisions related to the experiment. Charlie may be any data analyst, and he may communicate with any person. It is argued that no rational person can be convinced by the CHSH argument when making empirical decisions on the Bell situation.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12071

Recommendations

• Bell's inequalities and EPR-B experiments: are they disjoint?
• Bayesian analysis of Bell inequalities.
• An analysis of Stapp's ``A Bell-type theorem without hidden variables
• Incompleteness in the Bell theorem with an arbitrary number of settings
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5873100

zbMATH Keywords

Bell's theoremCHSH inequalityquantum foundationlimitationconceptual variables

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Physics (00A79) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to quantum theory (81-02) General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40) Quantum state estimation, approximate cloning (81P50) Quantum cryptography (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P94)

Cites Work

• Relational quantum mechanics
• Statistics, causality and Bell's theorem
• Some Problems Connected with Statistical Inference
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden-Variable Theories
• The Theory of Representation for Boolean Algebras
• Ubiquitous Quantum Structure
• Could ordinary quantum mechanics be just fine for all practical purposes?
• Steps towards a unified basis for scientific models and methods
• The measurement problem: decoherence and convivial solipsism
• On the CHSH form of Bell's inequalities
• Loopholes in Bell inequality tests of local realism
• Epistemic Processes
• On reconstructing parts of quantum theory from two related maximal conceptual variables
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Information processing by networks of quantum decision makers

Cited In (4)

• A simple quantum model linked to decisions
• An alternative foundation of quantum theory
• Physical thinking and the GHZ theorem
• Why do Bell experiments?

This page was built for publication: The Bell experiment and the limitations of actors

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2139455)