Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems

DOI10.1016/J.ECONLET.2022.110552MaRDI QIDQ2158668zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors S. Gächter, Chris Starmer, Christian Thöni, Fabio Tufano, Till O. Weber

Publication date 26 July 2022

Published in Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2022.110552

zbMATH Keywords

coordinationsocial distancesaliencelab-in-the-field experimentonenesssocial closeness

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

2-person games (91A05) Experimental studies (91A90)

Recommendations

• Constrained interactions and social coordination
• A note on anti-coordination and social interactions
• The differential impact of friendship on cooperative and competitive coordination
• Social learning with coordination motives
• Learning to coordinate in social networks
• On non-cooperativeness in social distance games
• Cooperation, behavioural synchrony and status in social networks
• Social learning in coordination games: does status matter?
• Coordination and social learning

Cites work

• A notion of prominence for games with natural-language labels
• Coordination when there are restricted and unrestricted options
• Is knowledge curse or blessing in pure coordination problems?

Cited in

(2)

• The hedgehog's dilemma
• The differential impact of friendship on cooperative and competitive coordination

This page was built for publication: Social closeness can help, harm and be irrelevant in solving pure coordination problems

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2158668)