Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2173148

DOI10.1007/S10701-020-00336-6zbMATH Open1440.81014arXiv2002.01456OpenAlexW3100148630MaRDI QIDQ2173148FDOQ2173148


Authors: Ruth E. Kastner Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 22 April 2020

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. All of these paradoxes stem from assuming that quantum theory has only unitary (linear) physical dynamics, and the attendant ambiguity about what counts as a 'measurement'--i.e., the inability to account for the observation of determinate measurement outcomes from within the theory itself. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction: namely, the inconsistency inherent in treating an improper mixture (reduced density operator) as a proper, epistemic mixture. This is an illegitimate procedure that is nevertheless endemic if quantum theory is assumed to be always unitary. In contrast, under a non-unitary account of quantum state reduction yielding determinate outcomes, the use of a proper mixture for measurement results becomes legitimate, and this entire class of paradoxes cannot be mounted. The conclusion is that the real lesson of the FR paradox is that it is the unitary-only assumption that needs to be critically reassessed.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01456




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (11)





This page was built for publication: Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2173148)