Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox

DOI10.1007/S10701-020-00336-6MaRDI QIDQ2173148zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Ruth E. Kastner

Publication date 22 April 2020

Published in Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01456

zbMATH Keywords

quantum measurementquantum theoryWigner's friendFrauchiger-Renner paradoxSchrodinger's cat

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)

Abstract: The Frauchiger-Renner Paradox is an extension of paradoxes based on the 'Problem of Measurement,' such as Schrodinger's Cat and Wigner's Friend. All of these paradoxes stem from assuming that quantum theory has only unitary (linear) physical dynamics, and the attendant ambiguity about what counts as a 'measurement'--i.e., the inability to account for the observation of determinate measurement outcomes from within the theory itself. This paper discusses a basic inconsistency arising in the FR scenario at a much earlier point than the derived contradiction: namely, the inconsistency inherent in treating an improper mixture (reduced density operator) as a proper, epistemic mixture. This is an illegitimate procedure that is nevertheless endemic if quantum theory is assumed to be always unitary. In contrast, under a non-unitary account of quantum state reduction yielding determinate outcomes, the use of a proper mixture for measurement results becomes legitimate, and this entire class of paradoxes cannot be mounted. The conclusion is that the real lesson of the FR paradox is that it is the unitary-only assumption that needs to be critically reassessed.

Recommendations

• Copenhagen interpretation can survive the upgraded Schrödinger's cat gedankenexperiment
• Single-world theory of the extended Wigner's friend experiment
• Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
• No purification ontology, no quantum paradoxes
• Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3129193 (Why is no real title available?)
• A conjecture concerning determinism, reduction, and measurement in quantum mechanics
• Beyond complementarity
• Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action
• Inadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings
• On gravity's role in quantum state reduction
• Single-world theory of the extended Wigner's friend experiment
• The possibilist transactional interpretation and relativity
• The relativistic transactional interpretation: immune to the Maudlin challenge
• The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism
• Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems
• `Einselection' of pointer observables: the new H-theorem?

Cited in

(11)

• Copenhagen interpretation can survive the upgraded Schrödinger's cat gedankenexperiment
• Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
• Watching the clocks: interpreting the Page-Wootters formalism and the internal quantum reference frame programme
• On the foundation of space and time by quantum-events
• Wigner's convoluted friends
• No relation for Wigner's friend
• Relational analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner paradox and interaction-free detection of records from the past
• Understanding the Frauchiger-Renner argument
• Unitary interactions do not yield outcomes: attempting to model ``Wigner's friend
• Single-world theory of the extended Wigner's friend experiment
• A logico-epistemic investigation of Frauchiger and Renner's paradox

This page was built for publication: Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2173148)