Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2286504
Abstract: A recent no-go theorem (Frauchiger and Renner, 2018) establishes a contradiction from a specific application of quantum theory to a multi-agent setting. The proof of this theorem relies heavily on notions such as 'knows' or `is certain that'. This has stimulated an analysis of the theorem by Nurgalieva and del Rio (2018), in which they claim that it shows the "[i]nadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings" (ibid.). In this paper, we will offer a significantly extended and refined reconstruction of the theorem in multi-agent modal logic. We will then show that a thorough reconstruction of the proof as given by Frauchiger and Renner requires the reflexivity of access relations (system ). However, a stronger theorem is possible that already follows in serial frames, and hence also holds in systems of emph{doxastic} logic (such as ). After proving this, we will discuss the general implications for different interpretations of quantum probabilities as well as several options for dealing with the result.
Recommendations
- Inadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings
- Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox
- Quantum approach to epistemic semantics
- Quantum version of Aumann's approach to common knowledge: sufficient conditions of impossibility to agree on disagree
- Single-world theory of the extended Wigner's friend experiment
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 755666 (Why is no real title available?)
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- Dynamic epistemic logic
- Inadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings
- Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum computation and quantum information. 10th anniversary edition
- Quantum mechanics between ontology and epistemology
- Quantum physics without quantum philosophy
- Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
- Self-locating Uncertainty and the Origin of Probability in Everettian Quantum Mechanics
- Subjective probability and quantum certainty
- The quantum revolution in philosophy
- The relationship between knowledge, belief, and certainty
- Very improbable knowing
Cited in
(9)- Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend
- Logic meets Wigner's friend (and their friends)
- Relational analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner paradox and interaction-free detection of records from the past
- Toys can’t play: physical agents in Spekkens’ theory
- A logico-epistemic investigation of Frauchiger and Renner's paradox
- Underwriting information-theoretic accounts of quantum mechanics with a realist, psi-epistemic model
- Inadequacy of modal logic in quantum settings
- The paradox of classical reasoning
- Unitary-only quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself: on the Frauchiger-Renner paradox
This page was built for publication: Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2286504)