Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Three recent arguments seek to show that the universal applicability of unitary quantum theory is inconsistent with the assumption that a well-conducted measurement always has a definite physical outcome. In this paper I restate and analyze these arguments. The import of the first two is diminished by their dependence on assumptions about the outcomes of counterfactual measurements. But the third argument establishes its intended conclusion. Even if every well-conducted quantum measurement we ever make will have a definite physical outcome, this argument should make us reconsider the objectivity of that outcome.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3136643 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
- Local causality, probability and explanation
- Relational quantum mechanics
- Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. With an introduction by Alain Aspect
- The Emergent Multiverse
- The Problem of Measurement
Cited in
(33)- Quantons are quaint but basic and real, and the quantum theory explains much but not everything: Reply to my commentators
- QBism and relational quantum mechanics compared
- A quintet of quandaries: five No-Go theorems for relational quantum mechanics
- Securing the objectivity of relative facts in the quantum world
- Perspectival quantum realism
- Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
- Quantum reality, perspectivalism and covariance
- Reply to a comment on ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
- Comment on Healey's ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
- A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations
- Context, spacetime loops and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1971749 (Why is no real title available?)
- `Two dogmas' redux
- Agents in Healey's pragmatist quantum theory: a comparison with Pitowsky's approach to quantum mechanics
- Is quantum mechanics a new theory of probability?
- Quantum objective realism
- Why quantum theory is possibly wrong
- Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?
- Quantum epistemology and constructivism
- A possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox
- Logic meets Wigner's friend (and their friends)
- The Frauchiger-Renner argument: a new no-go result?
- Is the reality criterion analytic?
- Epistemic-pragmatist interpretations of quantum mechanics: a comparative assessment
- Allowing Wigner's friend to sequentially measure incompatible observables
- The original Wigner's friend paradox within a realist toy model
- Perspectives in and on quantum theory
- The extended Wigner's friend, many-and single-worlds and reasoning from observation
- The metaphysics of decoherence
- Objectivity in quantum measurement
- Wigner's diamond and the quantum fragmentation of space-time
- Objectivity in perspective: relationism in the Interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend
This page was built for publication: Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1735879)