Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity

DOI10.1007/S10701-018-0216-6MaRDI QIDQ1735879zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Richard Healey

Publication date 29 March 2019

Published in Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00421

zbMATH Keywords

quantum theoryobjectivityWigner's friendBruknerFrauchiger and Renner

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Quantum coherence, entanglement, quantum correlations (81P40)

Abstract: Three recent arguments seek to show that the universal applicability of unitary quantum theory is inconsistent with the assumption that a well-conducted measurement always has a definite physical outcome. In this paper I restate and analyze these arguments. The import of the first two is diminished by their dependence on assumptions about the outcomes of counterfactual measurements. But the third argument establishes its intended conclusion. Even if every well-conducted quantum measurement we ever make will have a definite physical outcome, this argument should make us reconsider the objectivity of that outcome.

Recommendations

• Comment on Healey's ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
• Objectivity in quantum measurement
• Reply to a comment on ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1748607
• The Quantum Theory of Measurement

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3136643 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3251317 (Why is no real title available?)
• Local causality, probability and explanation
• Relational quantum mechanics
• Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. With an introduction by Alain Aspect
• The Emergent Multiverse
• The Problem of Measurement

Cited in

(27)

• Comment on Healey's ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity
• `Two dogmas' redux
• A quintet of quandaries: five No-Go theorems for relational quantum mechanics
• QBism and relational quantum mechanics compared
• Context, spacetime loops and the interpretation of quantum mechanics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1971749 (Why is no real title available?)
• Respecting one's fellow: QBism's analysis of Wigner's friend
• A possibilistic no-go theorem on the Wigner's friend paradox
• Epistemic-pragmatist interpretations of quantum mechanics: a comparative assessment
• Securing the objectivity of relative facts in the quantum world
• Quantum information versus epistemic logic: an analysis of the Frauchiger-Renner theorem
• Is the reality criterion analytic?
• Objectivity in perspective: relationism in the Interpretation of quantum mechanics
• Quantum reality, perspectivalism and covariance
• Agents in Healey's pragmatist quantum theory: a comparison with Pitowsky's approach to quantum mechanics
• Is quantum mechanics a new theory of probability?
• Quantum objective realism
• Perspectival quantum realism
• Objectivity in quantum measurement
• The Frauchiger-Renner argument: a new no-go result?
• Quantum epistemology and constructivism
• Quantum probability: a reliable tool for an agent or a reliable source of reality?
• Logic meets Wigner's friend (and their friends)
• Why quantum theory is possibly wrong
• Quantons are quaint but basic and real, and the quantum theory explains much but not everything: Reply to my commentators
• A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations
• Reply to a comment on ``Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity

This page was built for publication: Quantum theory and the limits of objectivity

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1735879)