The annihilation number does not bound the 2-domination number from the above
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2174567
Abstract: The -domination number of a graph is the minimum cardinality of a set such that every vertex from is adjacent to at least two vertices in . The annihilation number is the largest integer such that the sum of the first terms of the non-decreasing degree sequence of is at most the number of its edges. It was conjectured that holds for every connected graph . The conjecture was earlier confirmed, in particular, for graphs of minimum degree , for trees, and for block graphs. In this paper, we disprove the conjecture by proving that the -domination number can be arbitrarily larger than the annihilation number. On the positive side we prove the conjectured bound for a large subclass of bipartite, connected cacti, thus generalizing a result of Jakovac from [Discrete Appl. Math. 260 (2019) 178--187].
Recommendations
- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of block graphs
- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of a tree
- Relating the total domination number and the annihilation number of cactus graphs and block graphs
- Bounding the domination number of a tree in terms of its annihilation number
- Relating the annihilation number and the total domination number for some graphs
Cites work
- \(k\)-domination and \(k\)-independence in graphs: A survey
- A note on the annihilation number and 2-domination number of a tree
- A note on the k-domination number of a graph
- Average eccentricity, \(k\)-packing and \(k\)-domination in graphs
- Bounds on the 2-domination number
- Graph theory
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3914370 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7033848 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5037208 (Why is no real title available?)
- Independence and k-domination in graphs
- Independence and the Havel-Hakimi residue
- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of a tree
- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of block graphs
- Relating the annihilation number and the total domination number of a tree
- Relating the total domination number and the annihilation number of cactus graphs and block graphs
- Total domination in graphs
Cited in
(13)- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of block graphs
- Relating the total domination number and the annihilation number for quasi-trees and some composite graphs
- Some more updates on an annihilation number conjecture: pros and cons
- Rainbow domination numbers of generalized Petersen graphs
- The domination number of wrapped butterfly digraphs
- A note on the annihilation number and 2-domination number of a tree
- The restrained double Roman domination in graphs
- Relating the annihilation number and the total domination number for some graphs
- Relating the annihilation number and the 2-domination number of a tree
- Counterexamples to the characterisation of graphs with equal independence and annihilation number
- 3-component domination numbers in graphs
- On the equality of domination number and 2-domination number
- On 3-component domination numbers in graphs
This page was built for publication: The annihilation number does not bound the 2-domination number from the above
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2174567)