Short proofs for slow consistency

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2176406

DOI10.1215/00294527-2019-0031zbMATH Open1455.03078arXiv1712.03251OpenAlexW3104797474WikidataQ113751503 ScholiaQ113751503MaRDI QIDQ2176406FDOQ2176406

Fedor N. Pakhomov, Anton Freund

Publication date: 4 May 2020

Published in: Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Let operatornameCon(mathbfT)!estriction!x denote the finite consistency statement "there are no proofs of contradiction in mathbfT with leqx symbols". For a large class of natural theories mathbfT, Pudl'ak has shown that the lengths of the shortest proofs of operatornameCon(mathbfT)!estriction!n in the theory mathbfT itself are bounded by a polynomial in n. At the same time he conjectures that mathbfT does not have polynomial proofs of the finite consistency statements operatornameCon(mathbfT+operatornameCon(mathbfT))!estriction!n. In contrast we show that Peano arithmetic (mathbfPA) has polynomial proofs of operatornameCon(mathbfPA+operatornameCon*(mathbfPA))!estriction!n, where operatornameCon*(mathbfPA) is the slow consistency statement for Peano arithmetic, introduced by S.-D. Friedman, Rathjen and Weiermann. We also obtain a new proof of the result that the usual consistency statement operatornameCon(mathbfPA) is equivalent to varepsilon0 iterations of slow consistency. Our argument is proof-theoretic, while previous investigations of slow consistency relied on non-standard models of arithmetic.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03251




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (5)





This page was built for publication: Short proofs for slow consistency

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2176406)