Automorphy of m-fold tensor products of GL(2)

Holomorphic modular forms of integral weight (11F11) Automorphic forms, one variable (11F12) Galois representations (11F80) Langlands-Weil conjectures, nonabelian class field theory (11R39)

Abstract: We prove that for any m > 1 given any m-tuple of Hecke eigenforms

f_{i}

of level 1 whose weights satisfy the usual regularity condition there is a self-dual cuspidal automorphic form

p i

of

G L_{2^{m}} (Q)

corresponding to their tensor product, i.e., such that the system of Galois representations attached to

p i

agrees with the tensor product of the ones attached to the cuspforms

f_{i}

.

Review text

Let \(f_1,\dots f_m\) be cuspforms of level \(1\) and weights \(k_1,\dots k_m\) respectively. Let \(u_i=k_i-1, \,\, i=1,\dots m.\) Assume that all \(2^m\) partial sums of integers \(u_1,\dots ,u_m\) are different. This condition guarantees that the tensor product of the \(l\)-adic Galois representations of \(f_1,\dots f_m\) is regular, i.e., has \(2^m\) different Hodge-Tate weights. The main result of the paper is then the automorphy of the \(m\)-fold tensor product of the \(l\)-adic representations corresponding to \(f_1,\dots, f_m,\) and the analytic continuation of the corresponding \(L\)-function. Such a clean result is certainly very interesting and has potential for applications. To prove his result the author uses 11 steps developed in [the author, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 104, No. 4, 619--656 (2015; Zbl 1325.11052)] and additional 4 moves at the end. These steps are technical and therefore (as the author writes) this paper should be considered as the sequel to [loc. cit.]. After applying these moves the author applies the downward induction on \(m.\) However, there are technical difficulties that make known authomorphy lifting theorems non-applicable. The author is forced to prove new variants of these. Although the paper is technical, it is nicely written.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(3)

This page was built for publication: Automorphy of \(m\)-fold tensor products of GL(2)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2177526)