Linear independence of values of G-functions

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2178259



Abstract: Given any non-polynomial G-function F(z)=sumk=0inftyAkzk of radius of convergence R, we consider the G-functions Fn[s](z)=sumk=0inftyfracAk(k+n)szk for any integers sgeq0 and ngeq1. For any fixed algebraic number alpha such that 0extlessvertalphavertextlessR and any number field mathbbK containing alpha and the Ak's, we define Phialpha,S as the mathbbK-vector space generated by the values Fn[s](alpha), nge1 and 0leqsleqS. We prove that umathbbK,Flog(S)leqdimmathbbK(Phialpha,S)leqvFS for any S, with effective constants umathbbK,Fextgreater0 and vFextgreater0, and that the family (Fn[s](alpha))1lenlevF,sge0 contains infinitely many irrational numbers. This theorem applies in particular when F is an hypergeometric series with rational parameters or a multiple polylogarithm, and it encompasses a previous result by the second author and Marcovecchio in the case of polylogarithms. The proof relies on an explicit construction of Pad'e-type approximants. It makes use of results of Andr'e, Chudnovsky and Katz on G-operators, of a new linear independence criterion `a la Nesterenko over number fields, of singularity analysis as well as of the saddle point method.


Let \(R\) be a positive real number, \(\mathbb K\) be a number field and \(\alpha\in\mathbb K\) with \(0<\vert \alpha\vert <R\). Set \(F(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty A_kz^k\) with radius \(R\) and where \(A_k\in\mathbb K\) for all non-negative integers \(k\). For any integers \(n\geq 1\) and \(s\geq 0\) set \(F_{n,s}(z)=\sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{A_k}{(n+k)^s}z^{k+n}\). For any non-negative integer \(S\) set \(\Phi_{\alpha ,S}\) the \(\mathbb K\)-vector space spanned by the numbers \(F_{n,s}(\alpha)\) for \(n\geq 1\) and \(0\leq s\leq S\). Let \(\mu\) be a non-negative integer. Assume that \(L=\sum_{j=0}^\mu P_j(z)(d/dz)^j\in\overline{\mathbb Q}[z,d/dz]\) such that \(LF(z)=0\) and \(L\) is of minimal order for \(F\). Denote by \(\delta\) the degree of \(L\) and \(\omega >0\) the multiplicity of \(0\) as a singularity of \(L\). Set \(l=\delta -\omega\) and \(l_0=\max(l,t_1,\dots ,t_\nu)\) where \(t_1,\dots ,t_\nu\) are the integer exponents of \(L\) at \(\infty\). Suppose that \(F\) is not polynomial. Then the authors prove that there exists an effective constant \(C(F)>0\) such that for any \(\beta\in\mathbb K\) with \(0<\vert\beta\vert <R\) we have \[\frac{1+o(1)}{[\mathbb K:\mathbb Q]C(F)}\log(S)\leq \dim_{\mathbb K}\Phi_{\beta ,S}\leq l_0S+\mu. \] The second inequality holds for all \(S\geq 0\) while in the first one, \(o(1)\) is for \(S\to\infty\).



Cites work


Cited in
(24)








This page was built for publication: Linear independence of values of \(G\)-functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2178259)