Hyperparameter estimation in Bayesian MAP estimation: parameterizations and consistency

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2188103

DOI10.5802/SMAI-JCM.62zbMATH Open1441.62084arXiv1905.04365OpenAlexW3019884851MaRDI QIDQ2188103FDOQ2188103

T. Helin, M. M. Dunlop, A. M. Stuart

Publication date: 3 June 2020

Published in: The SMAI journal of computational mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The Bayesian formulation of inverse problems is attractive for three primary reasons: it provides a clear modelling framework; means for uncertainty quantification; and it allows for principled learning of hyperparameters. The posterior distribution may be explored by sampling methods, but for many problems it is computationally infeasible to do so. In this situation maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimators are often sought. Whilst these are relatively cheap to compute, and have an attractive variational formulation, a key drawback is their lack of invariance under change of parameterization. This is a particularly significant issue when hierarchical priors are employed to learn hyperparameters. In this paper we study the effect of the choice of parameterization on MAP estimators when a conditionally Gaussian hierarchical prior distribution is employed. Specifically we consider the centred parameterization, the natural parameterization in which the unknown state is solved for directly, and the noncentred parameterization, which works with a whitened Gaussian as the unknown state variable, and arises when considering dimension-robust MCMC algorithms; MAP estimation is well-defined in the nonparametric setting only for the noncentred parameterization. However, we show that MAP estimates based on the noncentred parameterization are not consistent as estimators of hyperparameters; conversely, we show that limits of finite-dimensional centred MAP estimators are consistent as the dimension tends to infinity. We also consider empirical Bayesian hyperparameter estimation, show consistency of these estimates, and demonstrate that they are more robust with respect to noise than centred MAP estimates. An underpinning concept throughout is that hyperparameters may only be recovered up to measure equivalence, a well-known phenomenon in the context of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04365




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (10)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Hyperparameter estimation in Bayesian MAP estimation: parameterizations and consistency

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2188103)