Supergrading: how diverse standards can improve collective performance in ranking tasks

DOI10.1007/S11238-019-09738-ZzbMATH Open1443.91135OpenAlexW2995147466MaRDI QIDQ2188235FDOQ2188235

Authors: Michael Morreau 

Publication date: 10 June 2020

Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09738-z

Recommendations

• Grading by committees: an axiomatic approach
• Ranking by rating
• The wisdom of collective grading and the effects of epistemic and semantic diversity
• Grading exams: 100,99,98,\(\dots \) or \(A,B,C\)?
• How to rank rankings? Group performance in multiple-prize contests

zbMATH Keywords

social choicecognitive diversitycollective intelligencescoring and grading

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Cites Work

• Random forests
• Interpreted and generated signals
• A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking

This page was built for publication: Supergrading: how diverse standards can improve collective performance in ranking tasks

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2188235)