Three-valued semantic pluralism: a defense of a three-valued solution to the \textit{sorites} paradox
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2218709
Recommendations
- Three-valued plurivaluationism of vague predicates
- Maximal and premaximal paraconsistency in the framework of three-valued semantics
- Three-valued logics: An introduction, a comparison of various logical lexica, and some philosophical remarks
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks
- Plurivaluationism, supersententialism and the problem of the many languages
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4160107
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4147552
- Trivalent semantics and the vaguely vague
- Two kinds of (binary) Kripke-style semantics for three-valued logic
- Three-valued paraconsistent propositional logics
Cites work
- A site for Sorites
- An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
- General semantics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1852988 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3061149 (Why is no real title available?)
- Saving truth from paradox
- The logic of inexact concepts
- Vagueness, truth and logic
- Wang's paradox
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Three-valued semantic pluralism: a defense of a three-valued solution to the \textit{sorites} paradox
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2218709)