How could relativity be anything other than physical?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2272840
Recommendations
Cites work
- Gravity from self-interaction in a curved background
- Gravity from self-interaction redux
- Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance: the cart and the horse or two sides of a single coin?
- Newtonian spacetime structure in light of the equivalence principle
- Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective
- Space-time constructivism \textit{vs.} modal provincialism: Or, how special relativistic theories needn't show Minkowski chronogeometry
- Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination
- Why Constructive Relativity Fails
Cited in
(15)- General-relativistic covariance
- Unweyling three mysteries of Nordström gravity
- Physical Relativity: the dynamical approach to space-time
- Physical relativity from a functionalist perspective
- Conservation, inertia, and spacetime geometry
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5990062 (Why is no real title available?)
- Geometric objects and perspectivalism
- Why Constructive Relativity Fails
- Relativity and the nature of spacetime
- What spacetime does: ideal observers and (Earman's) symmetry principles
- The limitations of inertial frame spacetime functionalism
- The general-relativistic case for super-substantivalism
- Geometrical Constructivism and Modal Relationalism: Further Aspects of the Dynamical/Geometrical Debate
- Explanation, analyticity and constitutive principles in spacetime theories
- An invitation to conventionalism: a philosophy for modern (space-)times
This page was built for publication: How could relativity be anything other than physical?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2272840)