Space-time constructivism \textit{vs.} modal provincialism: Or, how special relativistic theories needn't show Minkowski chronogeometry
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2272846
Abstract: In 1835 Lobachevski entertained the possibility of multiple (rival) geometries. This idea has reappeared on occasion (e.g., Poincar'{e}) but didn't become key in space-time foundations prior to Brown's emph{Physical Relativity} (at the end, the interpretive key to the book). A crucial difference between his constructivism and orthodox "space-time realism" is modal scope. Constructivism applies to all local classical field theories, including those with multiple geometries. But the orthodox view provincially assumes a unique geometry, as familiar theories (Newton, Special Relativity, Nordstr"{o}m, and GR) have. They serve as the orthodox "canon." Their historical roles suggest a story of inevitable progress. Physics literature after c. 1920 is relevant to orthodoxy mostly as commentary on the canon, which closed in the 1910s. The orthodox view explains the behavior of matter as the manifestation of the real space-time geometry, which works within the canon. The orthodox view, Whiggish history, and the canon relate symbiotically. If one considers a theory outside the canon, space-time realism sheds little light on matter's behavior. Worse, it gives the wrong answer when applied to an example arguably in the canon, massive scalar gravity with universal coupling. Which is the true geometry---the flat metric from the Poincar'{e} symmetry, the conformally flat metric exhibited by material rods and clocks, or both---or is the question bad? How does space-time realism explain that all matter fields see the same curved geometry, given so many ways to mix and match? Constructivist attention to dynamical details is vindicated; geometrical shortcuts disappoint. The more exhaustive exploration of relativistic field theories (especially massive) in particle physics is an underused resource for foundations.
Recommendations
- Why Constructive Relativity Fails
- Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination
- Mathematical Constructivism in Spacetime
- Hermann Weyl on Minkowskian Space–Time and Riemannian Geometry
- Minkowski spacetime: A hundred years later. Dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the publication of Hermann Minkowski's paper ``Raum und Zeit in 1909
Cites work
- Before the Riemann tensor: the emergence of Einstein's double strategy
- Conditions for a symmetric connection to be a metric connection
- Confirmation of the secondary constraint and absence of ghost in massive gravity and bimetric gravity
- Convention: Poincaré and some of his critics
- Einstein's unification
- Einstein, Nordström and the early demise of scalar, Lorentz-covariant theories of gravitation
- Einsteins physical strategy, energy conservation, symmetries, and stability: ``But Grossmann \& I believed that the conservation laws were not satisfied
- Geometrized theories of gravitation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3831892 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1405993 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5044245 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2237955 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3057350 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3077767 (Why is no real title available?)
- Massive gravity acausality redux
- Massive Nordström scalar (density) gravities from universal coupling
- Null cones and Einstein's equations in Minkowski spacetime
- Permanent underdetermination from approximate empirical equivalence in field theory: massless and massive scalar gravity, neutrino, electromagnetic, Yang-Mills and gravitational theories
- Quantum Theory of Gravity. II. The Manifestly Covariant Theory
- Reconsidering Relativistic Causality
- Ricci-Calculus
- Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination
- Special-Relativistic Derivation of Generally Covariant Gravitation Theory
- Sufficient conditions for a curvature tensor to be Riemannian and for determining its metric
- The nature of spacetime in bigravity: two metrics or none?
- Why Constructive Relativity Fails
Cited in
(10)- Unweyling three mysteries of Nordström gravity
- How could relativity be anything other than physical?
- The redundancy of spacetime: Special relativity as a grammar and the strangeness of c
- Towards a theory of spacetime theories. Based on the presentations of a conference at the Interdisciplinary Centre for Science and Technology Studies, IZWT, Wuppertal, Germany, July 21--23, 2010
- Why Constructive Relativity Fails
- Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination
- On the boundary of the Cosmos
- Geometrical Constructivism and Modal Relationalism: Further Aspects of the Dynamical/Geometrical Debate
- Explanation, analyticity and constitutive principles in spacetime theories
- An invitation to conventionalism: a philosophy for modern (space-)times
This page was built for publication: Space-time constructivism \textit{vs.} modal provincialism: Or, how special relativistic theories needn't show Minkowski chronogeometry
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2272846)
