Evidence of randomisation bias in a large-scale social experiment: the case of ERA

DOI10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.01.003zbMath1456.62306OpenAlexW2514514007MaRDI QIDQ2294512

Barbara Sianesi

Publication date: 11 February 2020

Published in: Journal of Econometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2017.01.003

zbMATH Keywords

sample selectionexternal validitytreatment effectspartial identificationsocial experimentsmatching methodsrandomisation biasreweighting estimators

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to economics (62P20)

Related Items (1)

Randomization bias in field trials to evaluate targeting methods

Cites Work

• Predicting the efficacy of future training programs using past experiences at other locations
• The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference MethodsEstimation of Spatial Panels
• More on monotone instrumental variables
• Statistics and Causal Inference
• Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects
• Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
• Monotone Treatment Response
• Substitution and Dropout Bias in Social Experiments: A Study of an Influential Social Experiment
• Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
• Monotone Instrumental Variables: With an Application to the Returns to Schooling
• Nonparametric Analysis of Randomized Experiments with Missing Covariate and Outcome Data
• Disability and Employment
• Confidence Intervals for Partially Identified Parameters
• An equality test across nonparametric regressions
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Evidence of randomisation bias in a large-scale social experiment: the case of ERA