Supercover semantics for deontic action logic
The author constructs a formal language for deontic propositional logic which, he suggests, is better adapted than those currently available for expressing and analyzing free-choice permissions. The proposal follows \textit{R. Trypuz} and \textit{P. Kulicki} [J. Log. Comput. 25, No. 5, 1241--1260 (2015; Zbl 1336.03027)] in distinguishing syntactically between propositions and act-types, with deontic operators applicable only to the latter, and it follows \textit{M. Simons} [``Dividing things up: the semantics of or and the modal/or interaction, Nat. Lang. Seman. 13, 271--316 (2005; \url{doi:10.1007/s11050-004-2900-7})] in using a `supercover' semantics that assigns sets of action-types, as well as single action-types, to the action terms of the language. In this way, free-choice permission becomes an operation forming propositions out of sets of action-types. The construction validates certain formulae usually considered desirable for free-choice permission and invalidates certain others regarded as undesirable. An axiomatization is given, along with proofs of soundness and completeness.
- Deontic logic with action types and tokens
- Action type deontic logic
- Deontic logic based on inquisitive semantics
- Free choice and contextually permitted actions
- The dynamic logic of permission
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6741896
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4179343
- The paradoxes of permission an action based solution
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4051556
- A deontic action logic with sequential composition of actions
- A deontic logic of action
- A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic
- A systematics of deontic action logics based on Boolean algebra
- Action negation and alternative reductions for dynamic deontic logics
- Action type deontic logic
- Algebraic foundations for the semantic treatment of inquisitive content
- Basic action deontic logic
- Deontic action logic, atomic Boolean algebras and fault-tolerance
- Free choice and contextually permitted actions
- Free choice permission is strong permission
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3875225 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3670430 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3550662 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1748069 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6741896 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3365184 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inquisitive logic
- Inquisitive semantics
- Linear logic
- On deontic action logics based on Boolean algebra
- Open reading without free choice
- The connectives
- The dynamic logic of permission
- To do something else
- Towards a Logic of Information Exchange
This page was built for publication: Supercover semantics for deontic action logic
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2322983)