Comment on ``Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
DOI10.1214/18-STS689zbMATH Open1420.62347OpenAlexW2938297439WikidataQ130493991 ScholiaQ130493991MaRDI QIDQ2325614FDOQ2325614
Authors: Susan Gruber, Mark J. Van der Laan
Publication date: 27 September 2019
Published in: Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1555056034
Recommendations
- Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
- Comment: causal inference competitions: where should we aim?
- Comment: strengthening empirical evaluation of causal inference methods
- Comment: Will competition-winning methods for causal inference also succeed in practice?
- Comment: Spherical cows in a vacuum: data analysis competitions for causal inference
Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Theory of statistical experiments (62B15) Response surface designs (62K20)
Cites Work
Cited In (5)
- Comment: Spherical cows in a vacuum: data analysis competitions for causal inference
- Comment: Will competition-winning methods for causal inference also succeed in practice?
- Comment: causal inference competitions: where should we aim?
- Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
- Comment: strengthening empirical evaluation of causal inference methods
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Comment on ``Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2325614)