Comment on ``Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition

DOI10.1214/18-STS689MaRDI QIDQ2325614zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Susan Gruber, Mark J. Van der Laan

Publication date 27 September 2019

Published in Statistical Science (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ss/1555056034

zbMATH Keywords

causal inferencetargeted learningTMLE

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05) Theory of statistical experiments (62B15) Response surface designs (62K20)

Recommendations

• Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
• Comment: causal inference competitions: where should we aim?
• Comment: strengthening empirical evaluation of causal inference methods
• Comment: Will competition-winning methods for causal inference also succeed in practice?
• Comment: Spherical cows in a vacuum: data analysis competitions for causal inference

Cites work

• Super Learner

Cited in

(6)

• Comment: Spherical cows in a vacuum: data analysis competitions for causal inference
• Comment: Will competition-winning methods for causal inference also succeed in practice?
• Comment: causal inference competitions: where should we aim?
• Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition
• Semiparametric posterior corrections
• Comment: strengthening empirical evaluation of causal inference methods

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• SuperLearner

This page was built for publication: Comment on ``Automated versus do-it-yourself methods for causal inference: lessons learned from a data analysis competition

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2325614)