Confidence and varieties of bias

DOI10.1016/J.JMP.2018.10.002zbMATH Open1426.91068OpenAlexW2898982696WikidataQ129023627 ScholiaQ129023627MaRDI QIDQ2332825FDOQ2332825

Authors: Andrew Heathcote, Eleanor Holloway, James Sauer 

Publication date: 5 November 2019

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2018.10.002

Recommendations

• Correlated racing evidence accumulator models
• The accumulator model of two-choice discrimination
• Limitations of proposed signatures of Bayesian confidence
• Hierarchical models of simple mechanisms underlying confidence in decision making
• Confidence biases and learning among intuitive Bayesians

zbMATH Keywords

experimentdecision makingconfidenceresponse bias

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Experimental studies (91A90)

Cites Work

• Condorcet's paradox
• Testing precise hypotheses. With comments and a rejoinder by the authors
• Bayes factors for state-trace analysis
• Condorcet's paradox and the likelihood of its occurrence: Different perspectives on balanced preferences
• Generalising the drift rate distribution for linear ballistic accumulators

Cited In (3)

• Hierarchical models of simple mechanisms underlying confidence in decision making
• Understanding outcome bias
• Limitations of proposed signatures of Bayesian confidence

Uses Software

• lme4

This page was built for publication: Confidence and varieties of bias

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2332825)