Heuristic rating estimation: geometric approach
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2351529
Abstract: Heuristic Rating Estimation (HRE) is a newly proposed method supporting decisions analysis based on the use of pairwise comparisons. It allows that the ranking values of some alternatives (herein referred to as concepts) are initially known, whilst the ranks for the other concepts have yet to be estimated. To calculate the missing ranks it is assumed that the priority of every single concept can be determined as the weighted arithmetic mean of priorities of all the other concepts. It has been shown that the problem has admissible solution if the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons is not too high. The proposed approach adopts the heuristics according to which to determine the missing priorities a weighted geometric mean is used. In this approach, despite an increased complexity, the solution always exists and their existence does not depend on the inconsistency of the input matrix. Thus, the presented approach might be appropriate for a larger number of problems than the previous method. The formal definition of the proposed geometric heuristics is accompanied by two numerical examples.
Recommendations
- Heuristic rating estimation approach to the pairwise comparisons method
- A heuristic rating estimation algorithm for the pairwise comparisons method
- Notes on the existence of a solution in the pairwise comparisons method using the heuristic rating estimation approach
- An optimization approach to estimating ratios in Saaty's priority theory.
- Analytical incomplete multiplicative pairwise comparisons method
Cites work
- A heuristic rating estimation algorithm for the pairwise comparisons method
- A new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisons
- A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
- A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
- Computing a consistent approximation to a generalized pairwise comparisons matrix
- Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements
- Heuristic rating estimation approach to the pairwise comparisons method
- How to derive priorities in AHP: a comparative study
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1462120 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2209466 (Why is no real title available?)
- Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: a numerical study
- Llull and Copeland Voting Computationally Resist Bribery and Constructive Control
- M-matrix characterizations. I: nonsingular M-matrices
- On a pairwise comparison-based consistent non-numerical ranking
- On group decision making, consensus reaching, voting and voting paradoxes under fuzzy preferences and a fuzzy majority: a survey and some perspectives
- On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices
- On Saaty's and Koczkodaj's inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices
- On the Measurement of Intangibles. A Principal Eigenvector Approach to Relative Measurement Derived from Paired Comparisons
- Ramon Llull: from `Ars electionis' to social choice theory
- Ranking efficient units in DEA by using TOPSIS method
- The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix
Cited in
(6)- When is the condition of order preservation met?
- Inconsistency in the ordinal pairwise comparisons method with and without ties
- A heuristic rating estimation algorithm for the pairwise comparisons method
- Notes on the existence of a solution in the pairwise comparisons method using the heuristic rating estimation approach
- Heuristic rating estimation approach to the pairwise comparisons method
- Almost optimal manipulation of pairwise comparisons of alternatives
This page was built for publication: Heuristic rating estimation: geometric approach
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2351529)
