Invariant random subgroups of linear groups

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2357006



Abstract: Let Gamma<mathrmGLn(F) be a countable non-amenable linear group with a simple, center free Zariski closure, mathrmSub(Gamma) the space of all subgroups of Gamma with the, compact, metric, Chabauty topology. An invariant random subgroup (IRS) of Gamma is a conjugation invariant Borel probability measure on mathrmSub(Gamma). An mathrmIRS is called nontrivial if it does not have an atom in the trivial group, i.e. if it is nontrivial almost surely. We denote by mathrmIRS0(Gamma) the collection of all nontrivial mathrmIRS on Gamma. We show that there exits a free subgroup F<Gamma and a non-discrete group topology mathrmSt on Gamma such that for every muinmathrmIRS0(Gamma) the following properties hold: (i) mu-almost every subgroup of Gamma is open. (ii) FcdotDelta=Gamma for mu-almost every DeltainmathrmSub(Gamma). (iii) FcapDelta is infinitely generated, for every open subgroup. (iv) The map Phi:(mathrmSub(Gamma),mu)ightarrow(mathrmSub(F),Phi∗mu) given by DeltamapstoDeltacapF, is an F-invariant isomorphism of probability spaces. We say that an action of Gamma on a probability space, by measure preserving transformations, is almost surely non free (ASNF) if almost all point stabilizers are non-trivial. As a corollary of the above theorem we show that the product of finitely many ANSF Gamma-spaces, with the diagonal Gamma action, is ASNF. Let Gamma<mathrmGLn(F) be a countable linear group, AlhdGamma the maximal normal amenable subgroup of Gamma. We show that if muinmathrmIRS(Gamma) is supported on amenable subgroups of Gamma then in fact it is supported on mathrmSub(A). In particular if A(Gamma)=langleeangle then Delta=langleeangle,mu almost surely.


Let \(\Gamma\) be a countable group. \(\text{Sub}(\Gamma)\), the collection of all subgroups of \(\Gamma\), is a compact metrizable space under the Chabauty topology. An invariant random subgroup (IRS) of \(\Gamma\) is by definition a Borel probability measure on \(\text{Sub}(\Gamma)\) that is invariant w.r.t.\ \(\Gamma\) acting by conjugation. For example, if \(\Gamma\) acts on a probability space by measure preserving transformations, then the distribution of the stabilizer of a random point defines an IRS. The main result of the paper under review is somewhat reminiscent of the Tits alternative. A simple version, given as Theorem 1.14, is concerned with the case in which \(\Gamma\) is non-amenable, and \(\chi\) is a linear representation of \(\Gamma\) whose image has simple, center free, Zariski closure. \(\chi\) gives rise to a subclass \(\text{IRS}^{\chi}(\Gamma)\), consisting of those \(\mu\) for which almost all samples have nontrivial image under \(\chi\). Then there is a topology on \(\Gamma\) such that \(\mu\)-almost every \(\Delta \in \text{Sub}(\Gamma)\) is open for every \(\mu \in \text{IRS}^{\chi}(\Gamma)\). Furthermore, \(\Gamma\) contains a proper free subgroup \(F\) such that for every \(\mu \in \text{IRS}^{\chi}(\Gamma)\) one has that \(F \cdot \Delta = \Gamma, F \cap \Delta \neq 1\) for \(\mu\)-almost all random subgroups \(\Delta\), and \(\Delta \mapsto \Delta \cap F\) is an isomorphism of the probability spaces \((\text{Sub}(\Gamma), \mu)\) and \((\text{Sub}(F), \mu_{|F})\).



Cites work









This page was built for publication: Invariant random subgroups of linear groups

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2357006)