Formalizing mathematical knowledge as a biform theory graph: a case study

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2364688

DOI10.1007/978-3-319-62075-6_2zbMATH Open1367.68299arXiv1704.02253OpenAlexW2605703278WikidataQ60712705 ScholiaQ60712705MaRDI QIDQ2364688FDOQ2364688

William M. Farmer, Jacques Carette

Publication date: 21 July 2017

Abstract: A biform theory is a combination of an axiomatic theory and an algorithmic theory that supports the integration of reasoning and computation. These are ideal for formalizing algorithms that manipulate mathematical expressions. A theory graph is a network of theories connected by meaning-preserving theory morphisms that map the formulas of one theory to the formulas of another theory. Theory graphs are in turn well suited for formalizing mathematical knowledge at the most convenient level of abstraction using the most convenient vocabulary. We are interested in the problem of whether a body of mathematical knowledge can be effectively formalized as a theory graph of biform theories. As a test case, we look at the graph of theories encoding natural number arithmetic. We used two different formalisms to do this, which we describe and compare. The first is realized in mCTTmuqe, a version of Church's type theory with quotation and evaluation, and the second is realized in Agda, a dependently typed programming language.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.02253





Cites Work


Cited In (4)

Uses Software






This page was built for publication: Formalizing mathematical knowledge as a biform theory graph: a case study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2364688)