A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules

DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.04.004zbMath1186.91091OpenAlexW2005339540MaRDI QIDQ2381455

Claude Lamboray

Publication date: 18 September 2007

Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.04.004

zbMATH Keywords

prudent orderscomparison of ranking rules

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Social choice (91B14)

Related Items (4)

Maximum distance between Slater orders and Copeland orders of tournaments ⋮ A prudent characterization of the ranked pairs rule ⋮ Extensions of the prudence principle to exploit a valued outranking relation ⋮ A characterization of the prudent order preference function

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules
• The Copeland choice function. An axiomatic characterization
• Complete independence of clones in the ranked pairs rule
• The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny's method and Slater's rule
• The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison
• A geometric examination of Kemeny's rule
• A comparison of Dodgson's method and Kemeny's rule
• A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
• Maximum-likelihood paired comparison rankings
• Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making

This page was built for publication: A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules