A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2381455
DOI10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.04.004zbMath1186.91091OpenAlexW2005339540MaRDI QIDQ2381455
Publication date: 18 September 2007
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2007.04.004
Related Items (4)
Maximum distance between Slater orders and Copeland orders of tournaments ⋮ A prudent characterization of the ranked pairs rule ⋮ Extensions of the prudence principle to exploit a valued outranking relation ⋮ A characterization of the prudent order preference function
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules
- The Copeland choice function. An axiomatic characterization
- Complete independence of clones in the ranked pairs rule
- The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny's method and Slater's rule
- The Dodgson ranking and the Borda count: a binary comparison
- A geometric examination of Kemeny's rule
- A comparison of Dodgson's method and Kemeny's rule
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Maximum-likelihood paired comparison rankings
- Ordinal ranking methods for multicriterion decision making
This page was built for publication: A comparison between the prudent order and the ranking obtained with Borda's, Copeland's, Slater's and Kemeny's rules