The phantom cover of a module.
DOI10.1016/j.aim.2007.03.010zbMath1128.16005OpenAlexW2055470556WikidataQ116254640 ScholiaQ116254640MaRDI QIDQ2381961
Publication date: 26 September 2007
Published in: Advances in Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2007.03.010
flat coverscotorsion modulesequivalences of categoriespure injective modulesphantom coversphantom morphisms
Injective modules, self-injective associative rings (16D50) Module categories in associative algebras (16D90) Free, projective, and flat modules and ideals in associative algebras (16D40) Homological functors on modules (Tor, Ext, etc.) in associative algebras (16E30) Ext and Tor, generalizations, Künneth formula (category-theoretic aspects) (18G15)
Related Items
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Contravariant functors on the category of finitely presented modules.
- Model theory of modules
- The Brown representability theorem and phantomless triangulated categories
- Ideals in triangulated categories: Phantoms, ghosts and skeleta
- Exactly definable categories
- Phantom maps in the stable module category
- Phantom maps and homology theories
- Realizing maps between modules over Tate cohomology rings.
- Flat covers of modules
- Purity and almost split morphisms in abstract homotopy categories: A unified approach via Brown representability
- Smashing subcategories and the telescope conjecture -- an algebraic approach
- Relative homological algebra and purity in triangulated categories
- Purity and algebraic compactness for modules
- Triangulated Categories
- ALL MODULES HAVE FLAT COVERS
- Flat Covers in the Category of Quasi-coherent Sheaves Over the Projective Line
- A Remark on Colimits
- Locally finitely presented additive categories
- The Ziegler Spectrum of a Locally Coherent Grothendieck Category
- WHEN ARE PURE-INJECTIVE ENVELOPES OF FLAT MODULES FLAT?
- Stable module theory
- Phantom maps and purity in modular representation theory. II