Some further remarks on good sets

DOI10.1007/S12044-007-0015-ZMaRDI QIDQ2384693zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors K. Gowri Navada

Publication date 10 October 2007

Published in Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Mathematical Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1962

zbMATH Keywords

boundarysuperposition of functionsgood set

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Representation and superposition of functions (26B40)

Abstract: We show that in n-fold cartesian product, n >= 4, a related component need not be a full component. We also prove that when n >= 4, uniform boundedness of lengths of geodesics is not a necessary condition for boundedness of solutions of (1) for bounded function f.

Recommendations

• Some remarks on good sets
• Geometry of good sets in n-fold Cartesian product
• A criterion on compactness of the set of bounded solutions
• On the convex components of a set in \(\mathbb{R}^n\)
• Sufficient sets for boundedness of L-index in direction for entire functions

Cites work

• Geometry of good sets in n-fold Cartesian product
• Kolmogorov's superposition theorem and sums of algebras
• Some remarks on good sets
• When is \(f(x,y)=u(x)+v(y)\)?
• When is \(f(x_1,x_1,\dots,x_n)= u_1(x_1)+ u_2(x_2)+\cdots+ u_n(x_n)\)?

Cited in

(4)

• Some remarks on good sets
• Geometry of good sets in n-fold Cartesian product
• On the representation by sums of algebras of continuous functions
• Some notices on genuine sets

This page was built for publication: Some further remarks on good sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2384693)