Some further remarks on good sets

DOI10.1007/S12044-007-0015-ZzbMATH Open1129.26010arXiv0707.1962OpenAlexW1988493522MaRDI QIDQ2384693FDOQ2384693

Authors: K. Gowri Navada 

Publication date: 10 October 2007

Published in: Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Mathematical Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We show that in n-fold cartesian product, n >= 4, a related component need not be a full component. We also prove that when n >= 4, uniform boundedness of lengths of geodesics is not a necessary condition for boundedness of solutions of (1) for bounded function f.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1962

Recommendations

• Some remarks on good sets
• Geometry of good sets in \(n\)-fold Cartesian product
• A criterion on compactness of the set of bounded solutions
• On the convex components of a set in \(\mathbb{R}^n\)
• Sufficient sets for boundedness of L-index in direction for entire functions

zbMATH Keywords

boundarysuperposition of functionsgood set

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Representation and superposition of functions (26B40)

Cites Work

• When is \(f(x_1,x_1,\dots,x_n)= u_1(x_1)+ u_2(x_2)+\cdots+ u_n(x_n)\)?
• Some remarks on good sets
• When is \(f(x,y)=u(x)+v(y)\)?
• Kolmogorov's superposition theorem and sums of algebras
• Geometry of good sets in \(n\)-fold Cartesian product

Cited In (4)

• Some remarks on good sets
• Geometry of good sets in \(n\)-fold Cartesian product
• On the representation by sums of algebras of continuous functions
• Some notices on genuine sets

This page was built for publication: Some further remarks on good sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2384693)