Some further remarks on good sets

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2384693



Abstract: We show that in n-fold cartesian product, n >= 4, a related component need not be a full component. We also prove that when n >= 4, uniform boundedness of lengths of geodesics is not a necessary condition for boundedness of solutions of (1) for bounded function f.


In the present paper a good set is a subset of a Cartesian product of finitely many sets on which every real/complex-valued function~\(f\) can be written as \[ f(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_n)=u_1(x_1)+u_2(x_2)+\cdots +u_n(x_n). \] A boundary for such a set is a set on which initial conditions can be specified to ensure the \(u_i\) to be unique. Furthermore, a set is full if it is maximally good in the product of its projections; a good set can always be partitioned into its maximal full subsets. Another equivalence relation on a good set is `\(x\) and \(y\) are in some finite full subset'. The author answers a question from \textit{A. Klopotowski, M. G. Nadkarni} and \textit{K. P. S. Bhaskara Rao} [Proc. Indian Acad. Sci., Math. Sci. 114, No. 2, 181--197 (2004; Zbl 1081.28002)] and constructs a full subset of \(\mathbb{N}^4\) where the second relation has infinitely many equivalence classes.











This page was built for publication: Some further remarks on good sets

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2384693)