Relating 2-rainbow domination to Roman domination

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2409786

DOI10.7151/DMGT.1956zbMATH Open1375.05188arXiv1512.01067OpenAlexW2963799887MaRDI QIDQ2409786FDOQ2409786


Authors: Simone Dantas, Dieter Rautenbach, José D. Alvarado Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 13 October 2017

Published in: Discussiones Mathematicae Graph Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: For a graph G, let gammaR(G) and gammar2(G) denote the Roman domination number of G and the 2-rainbow domination number of G, respectively. It is known that gammar2(G)leqgammaR(G)leqfrac32gammar2(G). Fujita and Furuya (Difference between 2-rainbow domination and Roman domination in graphs, Discrete Applied Mathematics 161 (2013) 806-812) present some kind of characterization of the graphs G for which gammaR(G)gammar2(G)=k for some integer k. Unfortunately, their result does not lead to an algorithm that allows to recognize these graphs efficiently. We show that for every fixed non-negative integer k, the recognition of the connected K4-free graphs G with gammaR(G)gammar2(G)=k is NP-hard, which implies that there is most likely no good characterization of these graphs. We characterize the graphs G such that gammar2(H)=gammaR(H) for every induced subgraph H of G, and collect several properties of the graphs G with gammaR(G)=frac32gammar2(G).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1512.01067




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (8)





This page was built for publication: Relating 2-rainbow domination to Roman domination

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2409786)