Corroboration and auxiliary hypotheses: Duhem's thesis revisited

DOI10.1007/s11229-009-9643-4zbMath1217.03016OpenAlexW2048172044MaRDI QIDQ2430815

Darrell P. Rowbottom

Publication date: 8 April 2011

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9643-4

zbMATH Keywords

confirmationDuhem's thesisfalsificationismcorroborationpopperQuine-Duhem thesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in the philosophy of science (03A10)

Related Items (1)

An impossibility theorem for amalgamating evidence

Cites Work

• On the proximity of the logical and `Objective Bayesian' interpretations of probability
• The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses
• The Bayesian Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses: Reply to Fitelson and Waterman
• Comparative Bayesian Confirmation and the Quine–Duhem Problem: A Rejoinder to Strevens
• A Falsifying Rule for Probability Statements
• Bayesian Confirmation and Auxiliary Hypotheses Revisited: A Reply to Strevens
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Corroboration and auxiliary hypotheses: Duhem's thesis revisited