Decision-theoretic troubleshooting: hardness of approximation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2440184

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2013.07.003zbMATH Open1390.68667arXiv1304.6551OpenAlexW2104625216MaRDI QIDQ2440184FDOQ2440184


Authors: Václav Lín Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 27 March 2014

Published in: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Decision-theoretic troubleshooting is one of the areas to which Bayesian networks can be applied. Given a probabilistic model of a malfunctioning man-made device, the task is to construct a repair strategy with minimal expected cost. The problem has received considerable attention over the past two decades. Efficient solution algorithms have been found for simple cases, whereas other variants have been proven NP-complete. We study several variants of the problem found in literature, and prove that computing approximate troubleshooting strategies is NP-hard. In the proofs, we exploit a close connection to set-covering problems.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6551




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)





This page was built for publication: Decision-theoretic troubleshooting: hardness of approximation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2440184)