The boundary at infinity of a rough CAT(0) space

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2453565



Abstract: We develop the boundary theory of rough CAT(0) spaces, a class of spaces that contains both Gromov hyperbolic and CAT(0) spaces. The resulting theory generalizes the common features of the Gromov boundary of a Gromov hyperbolic space and the ideal boundary of a complete CAT(0) space. It is not assumed that the spaces are geodesic or proper.


The boundary theory of Gromov hyperbolic and complete \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) spaces share common features; by ``boundary, we always mean some sort of boundary at infinity. In particular if \(X\) is both a Gromov hyperbolic space and a complete \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) space, then it is well known that its Gromov boundary \(\partial_G X\) and its ideal boundary \(\partial_I X\) can naturally be identified. The authors of the article under review defined a class of rough \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) spaces (abbreviated \(\mathrm{rCAT}(0)\)) in their article [Bull. Math. Soc. Sci. Math. Roum., Nouv. Sér. 55(103), No. 1, 3--33 (2012; Zbl 1265.51011)] where they investigated geometry of such spaces. By the authors, this new class of length spaces is arguable the smallest natural class of spaces that properly contains all Gromov hyperbolic length spaces and all \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) spaces. Building on the above article, the authors investigate the boundary theory of \(\mathrm{rCAT}(0)\) spaces. Unlike complete \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) spaces, geodesic rays in an \(\mathrm{rCAT}(0)\) space do not form the basis of a nice boundary theory, and completeness is not a useful assumption. Instead the authors replace geodesic rays by bouquets of short paths whose length tend to infinity. Next, they define the bouquet boundary \(\partial_B X\) of \(X\), and the associated bordification \(\bar{X}_B := X\cup\partial_B X\). Finally let us present two from the four of main theorems of the article under review. All are about the properties of the bouquet boundary. 1. Suppose \(X\) is a complete \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) space. Then \(\bar{X}_I\) equipped with the cone topology and \(\bar{X}_B\) equipped with the bouquet topology are naturally homeomorphic. 2. Suppose \(X\) is a \(\delta\)-hyperbolic length space \(\delta\geq 0\). Then \(\bar{X}_B\) equipped with the bouquet topology and \(\bar{X}_G\) equipped with the canonical topology are naturally homeomorphic.











This page was built for publication: The boundary at infinity of a rough \(\mathrm{CAT}(0)\) space

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2453565)