Should pregroup grammars be adorned with additional operations?

DOI10.1007/S11225-007-9094-1zbMATH Open1155.03013OpenAlexW2078877718MaRDI QIDQ2467222FDOQ2467222

J. Lambek

Publication date: 21 January 2008

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9094-1

zbMATH Keywords

pregroup grammarscategorial grammarsnatural language syntax and semantics

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Some Galois connections in elementary number theory
• The Mathematics of Sentence Structure
• The Lambek calculus enriched with additional connectives
• A computational algebraic approach to Latin grammar
• Some lattice models of bilinear logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Sequent systems for compact bilinear logic
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (4)

• From word to sentence: a pregroup analysis of the object pronoun \textit{who(m)}
• Type logics and pregroups
• Pregroups and natural language processing
• A Note on Multidimensional Dyck Languages

   Recommendations

• From word to sentence. A computational algebraic approach to grammar 👍 👎
• Pregroups and natural language processing 👍 👎
• Pregroup grammars and Chomsky's earliest examples 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Should pregroup grammars be adorned with additional operations?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2467222)