Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2473071

DOI10.1214/009053607000000514zbMATH Open1129.62039arXiv0803.2963OpenAlexW2018471882MaRDI QIDQ2473071FDOQ2473071


Authors: Yuhong Yang Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 26 February 2008

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Theoretical developments on cross validation (CV) have mainly focused on selecting one among a list of finite-dimensional models (e.g., subset or order selection in linear regression) or selecting a smoothing parameter (e.g., bandwidth for kernel smoothing). However, little is known about consistency of cross validation when applied to compare between parametric and nonparametric methods or within nonparametric methods. We show that under some conditions, with an appropriate choice of data splitting ratio, cross validation is consistent in the sense of selecting the better procedure with probability approaching 1. Our results reveal interesting behavior of cross validation. When comparing two models (procedures) converging at the same nonparametric rate, in contrast to the parametric case, it turns out that the proportion of data used for evaluation in CV does not need to be dominating in size. Furthermore, it can even be of a smaller order than the proportion for estimation while not affecting the consistency property.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0803.2963




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (41)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Consistency of cross validation for comparing regression procedures

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2473071)