Forcing and antifoundation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2486987
The author reworks the machinery of forcing under Aczel's axiom of antifundation (a strong negation of the axiom of foundation) [see \textit{P. Aczel}, Non-well-founded sets. Stanford, CA: CSLI (1988; Zbl 0668.04001)]. The main result is that if \(M\) is a countable, transitive model of ZFC minus foundation plus antifoundation then so is \(M[G]\). An erratum points out that a key point of the argument (the truth lemma) holds only in a weaker form.
Recommendations
Cites work
- Elementary induction on abstract structures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 42735 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 952378 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lectures in set theory with particular emphasis on the method of forcing
- Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs
Cited in
(11)- Forcing in admissible sets
- An axiomatic approach to forcing and generic extensions
- Undirecting membership in models of anti-foundation
- Forcing with the anti-foundation axiom
- Stranger things about forcing without AC.
- Set forcing over models of Zermelo or Mac Lane
- Forcing with non-wellfounded models
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1827832 (Why is no real title available?)
- Largest fixed points of set continuous operators and Boffa's Anti-Foundation
- Forcing under Anti‐Foundation Axiom: An expression of the stalks
- Antifoundation and transitive closure in the system of Zermelo
This page was built for publication: Forcing and antifoundation
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2486987)