Two challenges to the requirement of substantive general covariance
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2500809
Recommendations
Cites work
- AN EXAMPLE RELEVANT TO THE KRETSCHMANN–EINSTEIN DEBATE
- Loop quantum gravity
- Representations of spacetime diffeomorphisms. I: Canonical parametrized field theories. II: Canonical geometrodynamics
- The cosmological constant, the fate of the universe, unimodular gravity, and all that
- Theories of Newtonian gravity and empirical indistinguishability
Cited in
(13)- General-relativistic covariance
- The nontriviality of trivial general covariance: how electrons restrict `time' coordinates, spinors (almost) fit into tensor calculus, and \(\frac{7}{16}\) of a tetrad is surplus structure
- The hole argument and some physical and philosophical implications
- Substantive general covariance and the Einstein-Klein dispute: a Noetherian approach
- Explaining Leibniz equivalence as difference of non-inertial appearances: dis-solution of the hole argument and physical individuation of point-events
- Einstein's principle of equivalence and the heuristic significance of general covariance
- Can there be a process without time? Processualism within timeless physics
- On the meaning of the principle of general covariance
- Another look at general covariance and the equivalence of reference frames
- Constraining the physical state by symmetries
- On the multiple deaths of Whitehead's theory of gravity
- The relativity of inertia and reality of nothing
- Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute
This page was built for publication: Two challenges to the requirement of substantive general covariance
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2500809)