AN EXAMPLE RELEVANT TO THE KRETSCHMANN–EINSTEIN DEBATE

DOI10.1142/S0217732302006801zbMath1083.83512OpenAlexW1985975613WikidataQ129039072 ScholiaQ129039072MaRDI QIDQ5312278

Rafael D. Sorkin

Publication date: 31 August 2005

Published in: Modern Physics Letters A (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217732302006801

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Gravitational energy and conservation laws; groups of motions (83C40)

Related Items (12)

Coordinates, observables and symmetry in relativity ⋮ Constrained metric variations and emergent equilibrium surfaces ⋮ Theories of Newtonian gravity and empirical indistinguishability ⋮ Absolute objects and counterexamples: Jones-geroch dust, torretti constant curvature, tetrad-spinor, and scalar density ⋮ Background-independence ⋮ Explanation, analyticity and constitutive principles in spacetime theories ⋮ Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute ⋮ An elementary notion of gauge equivalence ⋮ Universally coupled massive gravity, III: dRGT-Maheshwari pure spin-2, Ogievetsky-Polubarinov and arbitrary mass terms ⋮ Two challenges to the requirement of substantive general covariance ⋮ The cosmological constant, the fate of the universe, unimodular gravity, and all that ⋮ Emergent gravity as the eraser of anomalous gauge boson masses, and QFT-GR concord

Cites Work

• On stress-energy tensors

This page was built for publication: AN EXAMPLE RELEVANT TO THE KRETSCHMANN–EINSTEIN DEBATE