Background-independence

DOI10.1007/S10714-011-1210-XMaRDI QIDQ648093zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Gordon Belot

Publication date 22 November 2011

Published in General Relativity and Gravitation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0920

zbMATH Keywords

absolute objectsbackground independencegeneral relativity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum field theory on curved space or space-time backgrounds (81T20) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05)

Abstract: Intuitively speaking, a classical field theory is background-independent if the structure required to make sense of its equations is itself subject to dynamical evolution, rather than being imposed ab initio. The aim of this paper is to provide an explication of this intuitive notion. Background-independence is not a not formal property of theories: the question whether a theory is background-independent depends upon how the theory is interpreted. Under the approach proposed here, a theory is fully background-independent relative to an interpretation if each physical possibility corresponds to a distinct spacetime geometry; and it falls short of full background-independence to the extent that this condition fails.

Recommendations

• Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute
• The case for background independence
• A definition of background independence
• Background independence and field redefinitions in quantum gravity
• Remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence

Cites work

• A definition of background independence
• Absolute objects and counterexamples: Jones-geroch dust, torretti constant curvature, tetrad-spinor, and scalar density
• An elementary notion of gauge equivalence
• AN EXAMPLE RELEVANT TO THE KRETSCHMANN–EINSTEIN DEBATE
• Cosmological measurements, time and observables in (2+1)-dimensional gravity
• Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories
• Covariant phase space formulation of parametrized field theories
• Einstein, Nordström and the early demise of scalar, Lorentz-covariant theories of gravitation
• Foreword
• General Relativity for Mathematicians
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3868743 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4096418 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 107699 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1232825 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1349692 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 478435 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 205892 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 777600 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1397423 (Why is no real title available?)
• Local symmetries and constraints
• Momenta and reduction for general relativity
• On integral formulas for submanifolds of spaces of constant curvature and some applications
• Presymplectic manifolds and the Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints
• Quantum Gravity
• Remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence
• The case for background independence
• The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
• The solution space of 2 + 1 gravity on in Witten's connection formulation

Cited in

(24)

• Hints towards the emergent nature of gravity
• Conceptual aspects of gauge/gravity duality
• A proposal for a Bohmian ontology of quantum gravity
• On Kim-independence
• Laplace's demon tries on Aristotle's cloak: on two approaches to determinism
• Relativistic spacetimes and definitions of determinism
• On geometric objects, the non-existence of a gravitational stress-energy tensor, and the uniqueness of the Einstein field equation
• Interpreting cosmic no hair theorems: Is fatalism about the far future of expanding cosmological models unavoidable?
• Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism
• Background independence and field redefinitions in quantum gravity
• A definition of background independence
• Einsteins equations for spin 2 mass 0 from Noethers converse Hilbertian assertion
• The case for background independence
• Locally covariant charged fields and background independence
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2065662 (Why is no real title available?)
• Background independence in a nutshell: the dynamics of a tetrahedron
• Background Independence in Classical and Quantum Gravity
• The dynamical approach to spin-2 gravity
• Cartography of the space of theories: an interpretational chart for fields that are both (dark) matter and spacetime
• Dark matter = modified gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime-matter distinction through the modified gravity/dark matter lens
• It ain't necessarily so: gravitational waves and energy transport
• Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute
• Is string field theory background independent?
• Can Bohmian mechanics be made background independent?

This page was built for publication: Background-independence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q648093)