Background-independence

DOI10.1007/S10714-011-1210-XzbMATH Open1228.83103arXiv1106.0920OpenAlexW3037128536MaRDI QIDQ648093FDOQ648093

Authors: Gordon Belot 

Publication date: 22 November 2011

Published in: General Relativity and Gravitation (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Intuitively speaking, a classical field theory is background-independent if the structure required to make sense of its equations is itself subject to dynamical evolution, rather than being imposed ab initio. The aim of this paper is to provide an explication of this intuitive notion. Background-independence is not a not formal property of theories: the question whether a theory is background-independent depends upon how the theory is interpreted. Under the approach proposed here, a theory is fully background-independent relative to an interpretation if each physical possibility corresponds to a distinct spacetime geometry; and it falls short of full background-independence to the extent that this condition fails.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0920

Recommendations

• Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute
• The case for background independence
• A definition of background independence
• Background independence and field redefinitions in quantum gravity
• Remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence

zbMATH Keywords

general relativitybackground independenceabsolute objects

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Quantum field theory on curved space or space-time backgrounds (81T20) Einstein's equations (general structure, canonical formalism, Cauchy problems) (83C05) Quantization of the gravitational field (83C45) Geometrodynamics and the holographic principle (83E05)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time
• On integral formulas for submanifolds of spaces of constant curvature and some applications
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Local symmetries and constraints
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Quantum Gravity
• General Relativity for Mathematicians
• Einstein, Nordström and the early demise of scalar, Lorentz-covariant theories of gravitation
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Cosmological measurements, time and observables in (2+1)-dimensional gravity
• Momenta and reduction for general relativity
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Presymplectic manifolds and the Dirac–Bergmann theory of constraints
• AN EXAMPLE RELEVANT TO THE KRETSCHMANN–EINSTEIN DEBATE
• An elementary notion of gauge equivalence
• A definition of background independence
• Remarks on the notions of general covariance and background independence
• The case for background independence
• Absolute objects and counterexamples: Jones-geroch dust, torretti constant curvature, tetrad-spinor, and scalar density
• Covariant phase space formulation of parametrized field theories
• The solution space of 2 + 1 gravity on in Witten's connection formulation
• Foreword

Cited In (21)

• Category-theoretic structure and radical ontic structural realism
• Conceptual aspects of gauge/gravity duality
• Hints towards the emergent nature of gravity
• The case for background independence
• A definition of background independence
• On geometric objects, the non-existence of a gravitational stress-energy tensor, and the uniqueness of the Einstein field equation
• Background independence in a nutshell: the dynamics of a tetrahedron
• A proposal for a Bohmian ontology of quantum gravity
• Relativistic spacetimes and definitions of determinism
• On Kim-independence
• Can Bohmian mechanics be made background independent?
• Background independence and field redefinitions in quantum gravity
• Cartography of the space of theories: an interpretational chart for fields that are both (dark) matter and spacetime
• Dark matter = modified gravity? Scrutinising the spacetime-matter distinction through the modified gravity/dark matter lens
• The dynamical approach to spin-2 gravity
• Einsteins equations for spin 2 mass 0 from Noethers converse Hilbertian assertion
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Laplace's demon tries on Aristotle's cloak: on two approaches to determinism
• Interpreting cosmic no hair theorems: Is fatalism about the far future of expanding cosmological models unavoidable?
• Background independence: lessons for further decades of dispute
• It ain't necessarily so: gravitational waves and energy transport

This page was built for publication: Background-independence

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q648093)