Majorization comparison of closed list electoral systems through a matrix theorem

DOI10.1007/S10479-015-1877-6MaRDI QIDQ256705zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors José Manuel Gutiérrez

Publication date 9 March 2016

Published in Annals of Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1877-6

zbMATH Keywords

apportionmentelectoral systemsmajorization

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History, political science (91F10) Voting theory (91B12)

Recommendations

• Majorization for (0,1)-matrices
• The space of all proportional voting systems and the most majoritarian among them
• Applications of \(M\)-matrices to majorization
• A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation
• Matrices and politics

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3912675 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 51837 (Why is no real title available?)
• A majorization comparison of apportionment methods in proportional representation
• Inequalities: theory of majorization and its applications
• Proportional representation. Apportionment methods and their applications. With a foreword by Andrew Duff
• The Balinski-Young comparison of divisor methods is transitive
• The Hamilton Apportionment Method Is Between the Adams Method and the Jefferson Method

This page was built for publication: Majorization comparison of closed list electoral systems through a matrix theorem

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q256705)