Spectral enrichments of model categories
In [\textit{W.G. Dwyer}, \textit{D.M. Kan}, Topology 19, 427-440 (1980; Zbl 0438.55011)] the authors have shown that given any model category \({\mathcal M}\) and objects \(X, Y\in \mathcal M\) one can construct a homotopy function complex \(\text{ Map}(X, Y)\). This is a simplicial set, natural in \(X\) and \(Y\), and such that its homotopy type depends only on weak equivalence classes of \(X\) and \(Y\). Moreover, for \(X, Y, Z\in \mathcal M\) we have composition maps \(\text{ Map}(X, Y)\times \text{ Map}(Y, Z)\rightarrow \text{ Map}(X, Z)\). The main result of this paper says that if \(\mathcal M\) is a stable model category (i.e. a pointed model category in which the suspension functor is homotopy invertible) then one can equip \(\mathcal M\) with function complexes which are symmetric spectra rather than just simplicial sets. If \(\mathcal N\) is a stable model category obtained as a localization of a model category of diagrams of pointed simplicial sets then existence of such spectral function complexes for \(\mathcal N\) follows from the results of [\textit{M. Hovey}, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 165, No.1, 63-127 (2001; Zbl 1008.55006)]. The author shows that if \(\mathcal M\) is Quillen equivalent to such localized category of diagrams \(\mathcal N\) then the spectral function complexes of \(\mathcal N\) can be transported to \(\mathcal M\). This approach differs in two main regards from the construction of Dwyer-Kan. First, one needs to assume that \(\mathcal M\) is Quillen equivalent to some localized category of diagrams of simplicial sets. This is however a mild technical condition satisfied by almost all interesting model categories. Secondly, this construction depends on the choice of a localized category of diagrams Quillen equivalent to \(\mathcal M\). The author proves though that spectral function complexes resulting from different choices are equivalent in an appropriate sense. In particular stable homotopy type of each of these function complexes is well defined. The paper is very clearly written. Its first sections and appendix A provide a nice description of enrichment of model categories.
- A curious example of triangulated-equivalent model categories which are not Quillen equivalent
- Homotopy theory of spectral categories
- About Quillen's homotopy theorie of derivatives
- Generalized spectral categories, topological Hochschild homology and trace maps
- Spectra of categories
- Enriched model categories in equivariant contexts
- DGAs with polynomial homology
- Enriched model categories and presheaf categories
- Are all localizing subcategories of stable homotopy categories coreflective?
- Localization of \({\mathcal V}\)-categories
- Model categories of diagram spectra
- Function spectra
- Towers and fibered products of model structures
- Prespectra and towers over model categories
- Stable frames in model categories
- Long knots and maps between operads
- Localization theorems in topological Hochschild homology and topological cyclic homology
- Calculus of functors and model categories. II
- Endomorphisms of exotic models
- STABLE LEFT AND RIGHT BOUSFIELD LOCALISATIONS
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5207778 (Why is no real title available?)
- Levels of algebraicity in stable homotopy theories
- Mapping spaces in quasi-categories
- Postnikov extensions of ring spectra
- Topological equivalences for differential graded algebras
- Modules over motivic cohomology
This page was built for publication: Spectral enrichments of model categories
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2575127)
