Consequences of effect size heterogeneity for meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo study

DOI10.1007/S10260-009-0125-0zbMATH Open1332.65018OpenAlexW2148038947WikidataQ58120510 ScholiaQ58120510MaRDI QIDQ257546FDOQ257546

Authors: Mark J. Koetse, Raymond J. G. M. Florax, Henri L. F. de Groot 

Publication date: 17 March 2016

Published in: Statistical Methods and Applications (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10260-009-0125-0

Recommendations

• Estimating Heterogeneity Variance in Meta-Analysis
• On random-effects meta-analysis
• Comparison of methods for fixed effect meta-regression of standardized differences of means
• The bias of the commonly-used estimate of variance in meta-analysis
• Simple Heterogeneity Variance Estimation for Meta-Analysis

zbMATH Keywords

meta-analysiseffect size heterogeneitymixed effects meta-estimatorMonte Carlo analysisOLS meta-estimatorsmall sample performanceWLS meta-estimator

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Monte Carlo methods (65C05)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)

Cited In (7)

• The consistency test may be too weak to be useful: its systematic application would not improve effect size estimation in meta-analyses
• Tracking truth through measurement and the spyglass of statistics
• Analysis of categorical moderators in mixed-effects meta-analysis: consequences of using pooled versus separate estimates of the residual between-studies variances
• Estimation of the predictive power of the model in mixed-effects meta-regression: a simulation study
• An effect size for variance heterogeneity in meta-analysis
• A comparison of the effect size estimators in meta-analysis
• Heterogeneity and study size in random-effects meta-analysis

This page was built for publication: Consequences of effect size heterogeneity for meta-analysis: a Monte Carlo study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q257546)