Strength of preference and cardinal utility
Axiomatic definitions of the difference relation are considered implying the existence of a utility function which is compatible with the underlying preference relation and represents the difference relation. The proposed axiomatics provide the most general representation of cardinal utility. The other known theorems follow as corollaries of the result proved in the present paper. Whether utility is ordinal or cardinal depends on underlying axiomatics which can be debated. However, the present paper is not arguing for either ordinal or cardinal utility. It concentrates on mathematical aspects showing how earlier derivations of cardinal utility can be simplified.
- The repetitions approach to characterize cardinal utility
- Uncertainty and binary stochastic choice
- Stochastic transitivity: axioms and models
- A case for cardinal utility and non-arbitrary choice of commodity units
- Bargaining with subjective mixtures
- Simple preference intensity comparisons
- Stochastic expected utility for binary choice: a `modular' axiomatic foundation
- How to measure the average rate of change?
- CUT: A Multicriteria Approach for Concavifiable Preferences
- Logarithmically homogeneous preferences
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4112340 (Why is no real title available?)
- Preference intensity and cardinality
- A theory of average growth rate indices
- Multiutility representations for incomplete difference preorders
- Theory of generalized risk attitudes
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 934571 (Why is no real title available?)
- Consistent probability attitudes
- Ordinal utility differences
- A single relation theory of welfarist social evaluation
- Reference-dependent expected utility with incomplete preferences
- Social choice with approximate interpersonal comparison of welfare gains
This page was built for publication: Strength of preference and cardinal utility
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2580970)