Practical propensity score matching: a reply to Smith and Todd

DOI10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.012zbMath1334.62209MaRDI QIDQ262740

Rajeev H. Dehejia

Publication date: 30 March 2016

Published in: Journal of Econometrics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.012

zbMATH Keywords

causal inference; non-experimental methods; program evaluation; labor training

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

62P20: Applications of statistics to economics

91B82: Statistical methods; economic indices and measures

Related Items

A Martingale Representation for Matching Estimators, Missing data imputation, matching and other applications of random recursive partitioning, The performance of estimators based on the propensity score

Cites Work

• Rejoinder: ``Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?
• Affinely invariant matching methods with ellipsoidal distributions
• Using Multivariate Matched Sampling and Regression Adjustment to Control Bias in Observational Studies
• The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
• Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator
• Characterizing the effect of matching using linear propensity score methods with normal distributions
• Multivariate Matching Methods That are Equal Percent Bias Reducing, I: Some Examples
• Multivariate Matching Methods That are Equal Percent Bias Reducing, II: Maximums on Bias Reduction for Fixed Sample Sizes
• Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice
• Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme
• Characterizing Selection Bias Using Experimental Data
• Bias-Corrected Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects