Proof compression and NP versus PSPACE
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2631644
Recommendations
- Proof compression and NP versus PSPACE. II
- Propositional proof compressions and DNF logic
- Proof compressions with circuit-structured substitutions
- How many times do we need an assumption to prove a tautology in minimal logic? Examples on the compression power of classical reasoning
- Exponentially huge natural deduction proofs are redundant: preliminary results on \(M_{\supset}\)
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3275554 (Why is no real title available?)
- An O(n log n)-Space Decision Procedure for Intuitionistic Propositional Logic
- Intuitionistic propositional logic is polynomial-space complete
- On the polynomial-space completeness of intuitionistic propositional logic
- Proof compressions with circuit-structured substitutions
- Proof-graphs for minimal implicational logic
- Propositional proof compressions and DNF logic
- Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities
Cited in
(6)- Exponentially huge natural deduction proofs are redundant: preliminary results on \(M_{\supset}\)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7564405 (Why is no real title available?)
- Proof compression and NP versus PSPACE. II
- Proof compressions with circuit-structured substitutions
- Propositional proof compressions and DNF logic
- Proof Compression and NP Versus PSPACE II: Addendum
This page was built for publication: Proof compression and NP versus PSPACE
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2631644)