Objective and subjective compliance: a norm-based explanation of `moral wiggle room'

DOI10.1016/J.GEB.2015.11.007zbMATH Open1347.91215OpenAlexW2193970241MaRDI QIDQ263394FDOQ263394

Authors: Arne Weiss, Kai Spiekermann 

Publication date: 5 April 2016

Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/64643/

Recommendations

• Words or deeds? Choosing what to know about others
• It's not a lie if you believe the norm does not apply: conditional norm-following and belief distortion
• Moral norms in a partly compliant society
• This is how we do it: how social norms and social identity shape decision making under uncertainty
• Revealed norm obedience

zbMATH Keywords

experimentuncertaintydictator gamenorm complianceself-serving biasesstrategic learning

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical economics (91B99) Experimental studies (91A90)

Cites Work

• Do I really want to know? A cognitive dissonance-based explanation of other-regarding behavior
• Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness
• Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets

Cited In (7)

• Debiasing preferences over redistribution: an experiment
• COMPLIANCE AND COMMAND II, IMPERATIVES AND DEONTICS
• Intention-based sharing
• Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control
• Moral norms in a partly compliant society
• Are moral norms distinct from social norms? A critical assessment of Jon Elster and Cristina Bicchieri
• It's not a lie if you believe the norm does not apply: conditional norm-following and belief distortion

Uses Software

• Z-Tree

This page was built for publication: Objective and subjective compliance: a norm-based explanation of `moral wiggle room'

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q263394)