Lakatos's criticism of Carnapian inductive logic was mistaken

DOI10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.014zbMath1436.03038OpenAlexW1834453223MaRDI QIDQ2634488

Teddy Groves

Publication date: 9 February 2016

Published in: Journal of Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2015.09.014

zbMATH Keywords

inductive logicphilosophy of scienceCarnaphistory of philosophyLakatos

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Probability and inductive logic (03B48) History of mathematical logic and foundations (03-03)

Related Items (2)

A triple uniqueness of the maximum entropy approach ⋮ Logical perspectives on the foundations of probability

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Artificial language philosophy of science
• A note on the inevitability of maximum entropy
• Some aspects of polyadic inductive logic
• W. E. Johnson's sufficientness postulate
• Analogical reasoning: Perspectives of artificial intelligence, cognitive science, and philosophy
• Common sense and maximum entropy
• Ferguson distributions via Polya urn schemes
• Resurrecting logical probability
• In defense of the maximum entropy inference process
• An application of Carnapian inductive logic to an argument in the philosophy of statistics
• The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
• Logic and Probability
• Pure Inductive Logic

This page was built for publication: Lakatos's criticism of Carnapian inductive logic was mistaken