Multiplicity one theorem for (GL_n+1, GL_n) over a local field of positive characteristic

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2663085



Abstract: Let mathbbF be a non-archimedean local field of positive characteristic different from 2. We consider distributions on mathrmGL(n+1,mathbbF) which are invariant under the adjoint action of mathrmGL(n,mathbbF). We prove that any such distribution is invariant with respect to transposition. This implies that the restriction to mathrmGL(n,mathbbF) of any irreducible smooth representation of mathrmGL(n+1,mathbbF) is multiplicity free.


Let \(\mathbb{F}\) be a non-Archimedean field of characteristic different from \(2\), and embed \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{F})\) into \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(\mathbb{F})\) via the standard upper-left embedding. The main result of this paper states that each distribution on \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(\mathbb{F})\) which is invariant under the conjugation action of \(\mathrm{GL}_n(\mathbb{F})\) is also invariant under transposition. Several corollaries follow in short order: Each irreducible smooth representation of \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{F})\) occurs with multiplicity at most \(1\) in the restriction of each irreducible smooth representation of \(\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}(\mathbb{F})\); and if \(P_n\) is the parabolic subgroup consisting of matrices whose final column is \((0,\ldots,0,1)\), then every \(P_n\)-invariant distribution on \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{F})\) is \(\mathrm{GL}_{n}(\mathbb{F})\)-invariant. These corollaries are previously known, but are nevertheless nice illustrations of the utility of the main result. The proof of the main theorem adapts a proof given in [\textit{A.\ Aizenbud} et al., Ann.\ Math. (2) 172, No.\ 2, 1407--1434 (2010; Zbl 1202.22012)] of the same result for the case where \(\mathbb{F}\) has characteristic zero, following essentially the same logical argument as given in [\textit{A.\ Aizenbud} and \textit{D.\ Gourevitch}, Sel.\ Math., New Ser.\ 15, No.\ 2, 271--294 (2009; Zbl 1185.22006)]. Thus, the proof proceeds by letting \(\tilde{G}\) be the semidirect product of \(\mathrm{GL}_n\) with a group of order \(2\) acting by transposition, and considering \((\tilde{G},\chi)\)-equivariant distributions on \(\mathrm{gl}(V) \times V \times V^{\ast}\), where \(\chi\) is the pull-back of the sign character. The main theorem is reformulated to state that all such equivariant distributions are zero, and then restrictions are derived on the possible support of such a distribution. The main difference in logical argument between this paper and these references is that Harish-Chandra descent is avoided here, which is necessary to avoid restrictions on the characteristic.











This page was built for publication: Multiplicity one theorem for \((\mathrm{GL}_{n+1}, \mathrm{GL}_n)\) over a local field of positive characteristic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2663085)