Simulation of the Hotelling-Smithies game: Hotelling was not so wrong
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2672864
DOI10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106513zbMath1492.91226OpenAlexW4224442018MaRDI QIDQ2672864
Luis Garcia-Perez, Ramón Alonso-Sanz, Juan Carlos Losada, Juan Grau-Climent
Publication date: 13 June 2022
Published in: Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2022.106513
Applications of game theory (91A80) Consumer behavior, demand theory (91B42) Spatial models in economics (91B72)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Competition in multi-characteristics spaces: Hotelling was almost right
- Economics of location: A selective survey
- Nash Q-learning agents in Hotelling's model: reestablishing equilibrium
- The free-rider in the quantum Stackelberg duopoly game
- Spatial simulation of the quantum Bertrand duopoly game
- Simulation of the quantum Cournot duopoly game
- Vertical differentiation beyond the uniform distribution
- Cellular automaton simulation of the quantum war of attrition game
- Cellular automaton simulation of the quantum hotelling game with reservation cost
- The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition
- On Hotelling's "Stability in Competition"
- Quantum Cournot equilibrium for the Hotelling–Smithies model of product choice
- Quantum Game Simulation
This page was built for publication: Simulation of the Hotelling-Smithies game: Hotelling was not so wrong
