Optimal epidemic control in equilibrium with imperfect testing and enforcement

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2682017

DOI10.1016/J.JET.2022.105570zbMATH Open1506.92100arXiv2104.04455OpenAlexW3174758075MaRDI QIDQ2682017FDOQ2682017


Authors: Thomas Phelan, Alexis Akira Toda Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 31 January 2023

Published in: Journal of Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We analyze equilibrium behavior and optimal policy within a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered epidemic model augmented with potentially undiagnosed agents who infer their health status and a social planner with imperfect enforcement of social distancing. We define and prove the existence of a perfect Bayesian Markov competitive equilibrium and contrast it with the efficient allocation subject to the same informational constraints. We identify two externalities, static (individual actions affect current risk of infection) and dynamic (individual actions affect future disease prevalence), and study how they are affected by limitations on testing and enforcement. We prove that a planner with imperfect enforcement will always wish to curtail activity, but that its incentives to do so vanish as testing becomes perfect. When a vaccine arrives far into the future, the planner with perfect enforcement may encourage activity before herd immunity. We find that lockdown policies have modest welfare gains, whereas quarantine policies are effective even with imperfect testing.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.04455




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (4)





This page was built for publication: Optimal epidemic control in equilibrium with imperfect testing and enforcement

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2682017)