A comparision of two methods of linking spatial and economic data from farm surveys

DOI10.1111/J.1467-842X.2012.00683.XzbMATH Open1334.86010OpenAlexW2060582083MaRDI QIDQ2802807FDOQ2802807

Chun Liang, Walter Shafron, Philip Kokic, Kenton Lawson, Lisa Elliston

Publication date: 27 April 2016

Published in: Australian \& New Zealand Journal of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2012.00683.x

zbMATH Keywords

hedonic regressionopportunity costgeoreferencing

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to economics (62P20) Geostatistics (86A32)

Cites Work

• Robust Statistics
• Statistics for Spatial Data
• The Future of Data Analysis
• Bootstrap Methods for Finite Populations
• Analysis of Survey Data
• Multipurpose Estimation from Unbalanced Samples

   Recommendations

• Title not available (Why is that?) 👍 👎
• Spatial econometrics for misaligned data 👍 👎
• Spatial Econometrics 👍 👎
• Inference in the spatial autoregressive efficiency model with an application to Dutch dairy farms 👍 👎
• New directions in spatial econometrics 👍 👎
• A class of spatial econometric methods in the empirical analysis of clusters of firms in the space 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: A comparision of two methods of linking spatial and economic data from farm surveys

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2802807)