Distinguishing perfect set properties in separable metrizable spaces

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2805029

DOI10.1017/JSL.2014.61zbMATH Open1372.03093arXiv1405.0191OpenAlexW2964151997MaRDI QIDQ2805029FDOQ2805029

Andrea Medini

Publication date: 9 May 2016

Published in: The Journal of Symbolic Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: All spaces are assumed to be separable and metrizable. Our main result is that the statement "For every space X, every closed subset of X has the perfect set property if and only if every analytic subset of X has the perfect set property" is equivalent to mathfrakb>omega1 (hence, in particular, it is independent of mathsfZFC). This, together with a theorem of Solecki and an example of Miller, will allow us to determine the status of the statement "For every space X, if every mathbfGamma subset of X has the perfect set property then every mathbfGamma subset of X has the perfect set property" as mathbfGamma,mathbfGamma range over all pointclasses of complexity at most analytic or coanalytic. Along the way, we define and investigate a property of independent interest. We will say that a subset W of 2omega has the Grinzing property if it is uncountable and for every uncountable YsubseteqW there exists an uncountable collection consisting of uncountable subsets of Y with pairwise disjoint closures in 2omega. The following theorems hold. (1) There exists a subset of 2omega with the Grinzing property. (2) Assume mathsfMA+egmathsfCH. Then 2omega has the Grinzing property. (3) Assume mathsfCH. Then 2omega does not have the Grinzing property. The first result was obtained by Miller using a theorem of Todorv{c}evi'c, and is needed in the proof of our main result.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1405.0191




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (3)





This page was built for publication: Distinguishing perfect set properties in separable metrizable spaces

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2805029)