Comparison of the categories of motives defined by Voevodsky and Nori
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2828664
DOI10.6094/UNIFR/11178zbMATH Open1357.14001arXiv1609.05516MaRDI QIDQ2828664FDOQ2828664
Authors: Daniel Harrer
Publication date: 26 October 2016
Abstract: In this thesis we compare V. Voevodsky's geometric motives to the derived category of M. Nori's abelian category of mixed motives by constructing a triangulated tensor functor between them. It will be compatible with the Betti realizations on both sides. We allow an arbitrary noetherian ring of coefficients, but require it to be a field or a Dedekind domain for the tensor structure on derived Nori motives to exist. There are three key ingredients: we present a theory of Nisnevich covers on finite acyclic diagrams of finite correspondences, explain, following D. Rydh, how to interpret finite correspondences as multivalued morphisms and elaborate on M. Nori's cohomological cell structures. For the first two, we will be working over an arbitrary regular scheme, but the last one will require that we restrict ourselves to a subfield of the complex numbers. On the way we also show that smooth commutative group schemes over a normal base automatically admit transfers, generalizing a result by M. Spiess and T. Szamuely.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.05516
Recommendations
Motivic cohomology; motivic homotopy theory (14F42) Rigid analytic geometry (14G22) Research exposition (monographs, survey articles) pertaining to algebraic geometry (14-02) Categories in geometry and topology (18F99)
Cited In (13)
- Numerical functors on Voevodsky's motives
- Syntactic categories for Nori motives
- Perverse, Hodge and motivic realizations of étale motives
- Nori 1-motives
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the motive of O'Grady's ten-dimensional hyper-Kähler varieties
- Geometric motives and the \(h\)-topology
- A note on Tannakian categories and mixed motives
- Levine's motivic comparison theorem revisited
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Book review of: A. Huber and S. Müller-Stach. Periods and Nori motives
- An abelian category of motivic sheaves
- An isomorphism of motivic Galois groups
This page was built for publication: Comparison of the categories of motives defined by Voevodsky and Nori
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2828664)