On the primes in the interval [3n,4n]
Modifying the elementary argument used by \textit{P. Erdős} to prove Bertrand's postulate stating that for any positive integer \(n\) there is always a prime number in the interval \([n, 2n]\) (see [Acta Litt. Sci. Szeged 5, 194--198 (1932; Zbl 0004.10103)]), this reviewer extended Bertrand's postulate and proved that for any positive integer \(n\) there is a prime number in the interval \([2n, 3n]\), [Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sci. 1, No. 13--16, 617--621 (2006; Zbl 1154.11303)]. In the paper at hand, the author uses similar arguments to prove that for any positive integer \(n\) there exists a prime in the interval \([3n, 4n]\). Moreover, the author gives a lower bound for the number of primes in \([3n, 4n]\) which implies that the number of primes in this interval tends to infinity as \(n\) approaches infinity.
- Primes in Ze^{(2\pi i/3)}
- Primes in the interval [2n,3n]
- Further sharpening of Euclid's argument on the infinitude of primes
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 21654 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3582250 (Why is no real title available?)
- Euclid's Argument on the Infinitude of Primes
- Extending Bertrand's postulate
- Explicit interval estimates for prime numbers
- Parsimony and inference to the best mathematical explanation
- Proof of the prime ladder conjecture
- Graph pattern detection: hardness for all induced patterns and faster noninduced cycles
- Generalizations of Bertrand’s Postulate to Sums of Any Number of Primes
- Existence of primes in the interval \([15x, 16x]\). An entirely elementary proof
This page was built for publication: On the primes in the interval \([3n,4n]\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2898688)