Comment on ``Motion of a helical vortex filament in superfluid ^4He under the extrinsic form of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 25, Paper No. 085101 (2013)]

From MaRDI portal
Publication:2947697

DOI10.1063/1.4855296zbMATH Open1321.76015arXiv1310.0232OpenAlexW3104212542MaRDI QIDQ2947697FDOQ2947697


Authors: Niklas Hietala, Risto Hänninen Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 28 September 2015

Published in: Physics of Fluids (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We comment on the paper by Van Gorder ["Motion of a helical vortex filament in superfluid 4He under the extrinsic form of the local induction approximation", Phys. Fluids 25, 085101 (2013)]. We point out that the flow of the normal fluid component parallel to the vortex will often lead into the Donnelly-Glaberson instability, which will cause the amplification of the Kelvin wave. We explain why the comparison to local nonlinear equation is unreasonable, and remark that neglecting the motion in the x-direction is not reasonable for a Kelvin wave with an arbitrary wave length and amplitude. The correct equations in the general case are also derived.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.0232




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (6)





This page was built for publication: Comment on ``Motion of a helical vortex filament in superfluid \(^{4}\)He under the extrinsic form of the local induction approximation [Phys. Fluids 25, Paper No. 085101 (2013)]

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q2947697)